Skip to main content

"Stardust" by Neil Gaiman

Why I read it: So I was sitting in a restaurant with Ed and the boy, and I mentioned that I was almost done "Inkheart" and I might read Stardust next. Ed freaked out and ranted that no, I wasn't going to do that, some other book would come ready for me at the library, and I would read that book instead, and I wouldn't finish Stardust, and it had been months and months and months since he had asked me to read it so then we could watch the movie. I pointed out that it could not possibly have been "months and months and months" because he'd gotten Stardust for Christmas, and that was, tops, four months ago, which can only be months and months, months being plural. You can't count the same months over and over when you're saying "months and months," the months are additive. I didn't mention that it hadn't technically been four months yet, because it was only about the 11th of April, so it couldn't even be months and months. That seemed superfluous.
What I liked: I read it in a day. It was a day when my jaw hurt and my neck hurt and I was having insane allergies, so it was really nice to have something that was totally enjoyable and entertaining and light and not difficult that I could breeze through and feel like I had accomplished something, other than blowing my nose 40 times. I also liked how so many disparate storylines joined together so neatly at the end. It's hard to do that without seeming contrived. And I liked that there were all these people looking for the star for different reasons. So often in fantasy lit, everyone is looking for the same thing for variations on the same reason. This was a refreshing change. I also liked that Tristram never really seemed all that special, for being half of faerie and all that. And the town of Wall, kind of like Bordertown, but with a more specific place, was great. I'd love to read something set in the now, rather than during the victorian era, set in Wall. I hope they still have the market every nine years.
What I hated: When it was over, maybe. Also, the part about Una being freed when the moon lost a daughter in a week that joined two mondays or whatever seemed a little trite. What is it with NG and having characters with last names that are the names of the week? And the short story at the end in the bonus materials was a little icky to me.
What I can steal: I loved the way he glossed over the necessary fantasy tropes that really drag out a novel. You know, where Tristram and the girl were almost press-ganged into a goblin war, and almost suckered into working in mines. Yeah, they were in a months-long trek across faerie, so those things happened, and they got out of them through their quick wits, and by running really fast. We don't need to have those scenes fleshed out. All-in-all, this book really had an excellent sense of proportion.

Popular posts from this blog

Best TW feedback ever

Over at the dayjob, SMEs are feverishly trying to get documents back to me all marked up, in preparation for the release that's supposed to happen the week I'm back from VP. Today's best comment: Unfortunately not true. SMEs, they're so cute.

Moraine

So a couple of days I thought I was done with this short story, and I wrote the last line of the story. I even dated it (that's how I can tell it's over). It was a little long, at 6600 words (I was aiming for 5000). But then I was walking to work, and I thought, "My, that was a lame ending. My endings are all crap." So yesterday morning, I scribbled out the date and wrote a bit more. And this morning I wrote a bit more again, and I dated it and called it done. And still, that ending seemed lame. So a few minutes later, in the last paragraph, I scratched out "the Oak Ridges Moraine" and wrote in "that stupid moraine". Much better. Now I can move on. But in the meantime, I was doing a little research about the Moraine, and I discovered that EGTourGuide lives on it. Only by one or two hundred feet, but I thought it was funny. Good for you, EGTourGuide, with all those excellent plants growing on that substandard soil, where in the olden days (you kno...

What I read: March 2024

  LHC #240: "Vita Nostra" by  Maryna and Serhiy Dyachenko. Translated by Julia Meitov Hersey. All I knew going in was dark academia. This was a neat thing to read after A Deadly Education last month. The students can leave this school at summer and winter break, but maybe they shouldn't. Also, interesting education method, providing Sasha with a CD player and punishing her if she leaves it in the mode where it plays all the tracks in sequence.  "Norse Mythology" by Neil Gaiman. When I finished Ragnarok by AS Byatt (last month? January?) I was thinking it might have made more sense if I had any knowledge of the subject matter. The boy had left this lying around, and it was not a tough read.  LHC #241: "Science on a mission: How Military funding shaped what we do and don't know about the ocean" by Naomi Oreskes.  I deferred this once because it was so long. History of science is challenging for me to read, because of the need to get a grasp on dispr...